Welcome to the end of amateurism—and the chaotic beginning of whatever comes next. In the wake of a landmark antitrust settlement, House v. NCAA, the college

Starting July 1, athletic departments will be able to compensate athletes directly from their revenues. Here's how the settlement of House v. NCAA will impact NCAA Division I schools.

One of the key terms in the House v. NCAA settlement, an NIL clearinghouse is rolling out. Called NIL Go, it will vet deals worth more than $600, and there are questions about what potential punishments would look like.

ESPN college basketball analyst Jay Bilas — one of the loudest critics of the NCAA and the highest-profile celebrity who long has demanded money for college athletes — says the new deal will allow players to get their money and schools to lock them down.

A federal judge’s final approval of the NCAA’s $2.8 billion settlement with student-athletes won’t quell all the antitrust threats for the sports organization as it seeks to provide stability in college sports.

We’re entering a new era of college football where colleges will now be able to pay players directly. And we’re looking at new scrutiny for so-called pay-to-play NIL deals. Michael Casagrande joins us to break down what the bombshell NCAA House settlement could mean for Alabama’s future.

The College Sports Commission is designed to regulate the NIL market but won’t have subpoena power to control rogue boosters.

The push from the NCAA and Power Five conferences to enact federal legislation regarding college sports is intensifying. House representatives Lisa McClain (R-Mich.)and Janelle Bynum (D-Ore.) introduced the “College Student-Athlete Protections and Opportunities through Rights,