Welcome to the end of amateurism—and the chaotic beginning of whatever comes next. In the wake of a landmark antitrust settlement, House v. NCAA, the college

Starting July 1, athletic departments will be able to compensate athletes directly from their revenues. Here's how the settlement of House v. NCAA will impact NCAA Division I schools.

I guess it would just be the same as the way things used to work,” an athletic director said. "We'd be right back where we started."

A federal judge’s final approval of the NCAA’s $2.8 billion settlement with student-athletes won’t quell all the antitrust threats for the sports organization as it seeks to provide stability in college sports.

The push from the NCAA and Power Five conferences to enact federal legislation regarding college sports is intensifying. House representatives Lisa McClain (R-Mich.)and Janelle Bynum (D-Ore.) introduced the “College Student-Athlete Protections and Opportunities through Rights,

ESPN college basketball analyst Jay Bilas — one of the loudest critics of the NCAA and the highest-profile celebrity who long has demanded money for college athletes — says the new deal will allow players to get their money and schools to lock them down.

The College Sports Commission is designed to regulate the NIL market but won’t have subpoena power to control rogue boosters.

The NCAA's landmark settlement in the House case included a pool of roughly $2.8 billion to be set aside for former college athletes who weren't allowed to be c